1. Rob.. last thing
- Posted by Vincent <darkvincentdude at yahoo.com>
Feb 10, 2006
-
Last edited Feb 11, 2006
Before one of us forgets,
Probably change:
"Other than possibly defining a new namespace identifier (see below), an include
statement will be quietly ignored if a file with the same name (but possibly
located in a different directory) has already been included."
to maybe this:
"An include statement will be quietly ignored if the same file has already been
included."
Once again thanks for fixing this. I'll be sure to test it along with
cooperative multi-tasking once you release the pre-alpha.
Thanks,
Vincent
2. Re: Rob.. last thing
- Posted by Robert Craig <rds at RapidEuphoria.com>
Feb 10, 2006
-
Last edited Feb 11, 2006
Vincent wrote:
> Before one of us forgets,
>
> Probably change:
>
> "Other than possibly defining a new namespace identifier (see below), an
> include
> statement will be quietly ignored if a file with the same name (but possibly
> located in a different directory) has already been included."
>
> to maybe this:
>
> "An include statement will be quietly ignored if the same file has already
> been
> included."
>
> Once again thanks for fixing this. I'll be sure to test it along with
> cooperative
> multi-tasking once you release the pre-alpha.
Thanks for the reminder, but I still need the bit about
defining a new namespace identifier. Two different files might
include a common file but have different namespace identifiers
that refer to it. The file should not actually be included a second time,
but you still have to allow a new namespace identifier to be defined.
Regards,
Rob Craig
Rapid Deployment Software
http://www.RapidEuphoria.com
3. Re: Rob.. last thing
- Posted by Vincent <darkvincentdude at yahoo.com>
Feb 10, 2006
-
Last edited Feb 11, 2006
Robert Craig wrote:
> Thanks for the reminder, but I still need the bit about
> defining a new namespace identifier. Two different files might
> include a common file but have different namespace identifiers
> that refer to it. The file should not actually be included a second time,
> but you still have to allow a new namespace identifier to be defined.
Right, my mistake. You know what to write.
Regards,
Vincent
