1. RE: better example
<snip>
> Now, for a 'philosophical' question, to one and all.
> Since your nice example proves that it's rather easy to add all this
> functionality to a win32lib program *without*
> adding it to the win32lib core, do we really need them 'included' ?
> "Win32lib created" programs that actually use "bitmapped" menu's, and
> "radio's", will probably be quite rare, in most
> cases.
** i get your point,...but windows is advancing. many windows
programmers out there no longer use basics. I'm talking this from a
commercial point of view.
"In most cases?" take a look at all new programmes out there, GUI is
playing a big role in their success.
nevertheless, you're still right.....so can these examples be added to
your tutorial somewhere for the mean time....or if they will never be
added to win32lib. i have bundles of cool things i have translated from
api to win32lib?
> Things will be different, of course, when Derek 'breaks' win32lib into
> smaller bits, but for now.... ???
>
> Wolf
>
>
>
