1. Is the newer version of Win32Lib and IDE slower
- Posted by Prasanta <prasanta_chakraborty at rediffmail.com> Aug 25, 2004
- 416 views
Hi, I had a small project developed with the older version of Win32Lib (Ver 0.58) and IDE (18.O). I have now upgraded to the new Win32Lib (6004) and IDE (18.11) but my application has become significantly slower! It takes almost a 30 secs to display a screen which earlier used to take 1-2 secs. Has anyone found a similar problem ?
2. Re: Is the newer version of Win32Lib and IDE slower
- Posted by Tommy Carlier <tommy.carlier at telenet.be> Aug 25, 2004
- 421 views
Prasanta wrote: > I had a small project developed with the older version of Win32Lib (Ver 0.58) > and IDE > (18.O). > I have now upgraded to the new Win32Lib (6004) and IDE (18.11) but my > application has > become significantly slower! It takes almost a 30 secs to display a screen > which earlier > used to take 1-2 secs. Has anyone found a similar problem ? No, usually my old programs run a bit faster, and are much more stable (less crashes). I don't think IDE has anything to do with the slowing down, since it's only used to design your application, and has no direct influence on the running speed. Could you show us some code? -- tommy online: http://users.telenet.be/tommycarlier Euphoria Message Board: http://uboard.proboards32.com
3. Re: Is the newer version of Win32Lib and IDE slower
- Posted by don cole <doncole at pacbell.net> Aug 25, 2004
- 419 views
Prasanta wrote: > > Hi, > > I had a small project developed with the older version of Win32Lib (Ver 0.58) > and IDE > (18.O). > I have now upgraded to the new Win32Lib (6004) and IDE (18.11) but my > application has > become significantly slower! It takes almost a 30 secs to display a screen > which earlier > used to take 1-2 secs. Has anyone found a similar problem ? > Yes I was using an older IDE program (written in another language) that I got from the archives. And when I finally got the latest (Euphoria version 18-16) of IDE to work, I found then new version to be much slower more than half the speed of the old version. I am speaking of the IDE program itself. It has no effect on the speed of final code I create. don cole SF
4. Re: Is the newer version of Win32Lib and IDE slower
- Posted by CoJaBo <cojabo at suscom.net> Aug 25, 2004
- 436 views
don cole wrote: > > Prasanta wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I had a small project developed with the older version of Win32Lib (Ver > > 0.58) and > IDE > > (18.O). > > I have now upgraded to the new Win32Lib (6004) and IDE (18.11) but my > > application > has > > become significantly slower! It takes almost a 30 secs to display a screen > > which > earlier > > used to take 1-2 secs. Has anyone found a similar problem ? > > > > Yes I was using an older IDE program (written in another language) that I got > from > the archives. It was translated to C, which is much faster than Euphoria. Is you get the Euphoria translator, you can create a C IDE yourself. > And when I finally got the latest (Euphoria version 18-16) of IDE to work, > I found then new version to be much slower more than half the speed of the old > version. > > I am speaking of the IDE program itself. It has no effect on the speed of > final code I create. > > don cole > SF >
5. Re: Is the newer version of Win32Lib and IDE slower
- Posted by Prasanta <prasanta_chakraborty at rediffmail.com> Aug 26, 2004
- 416 views
I suspect IDE because other than designing, IDE generates the basic code. My question was, with the layer and added new facilities, does the IDE generates some overhead which was not there earlier ? I would try something simpler to do some profiling. Regards, Prasanta.