1. Source to come: sequence implementation?
Hello there,
In light of the open source Eu to come, what do you think is
the best way to implement sequences in C (for the interpreter) ?
Take care,
Al
E boa sorte com sua programacao Euphoria!
My bumper sticker: "I brake for LED's"
From "Black Knight":
"I can live with losing the good fight,
but i can not live without fighting it".
"Well on second thought, maybe not."
2. Re: Source to come: sequence implementation?
Al Getz wrote:
>
> Hello there,
>
> In light of the open source Eu to come, what do you think is
> the best way to implement sequences in C (for the interpreter) ?
>
>
> Al
>
> E boa sorte com sua programacao Euphoria!
>
>
> My bumper sticker: "I brake for LED's"
>
Too soon to talk about the source code? 
Take care,
Al
E boa sorte com sua programacao Euphoria!
My bumper sticker: "I brake for LED's"
From "Black Knight":
"I can live with losing the good fight,
but i can not live without fighting it".
"Well on second thought, maybe not."
3. Re: Source to come: sequence implementation?
On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 21:31 -0700, Al Getz wrote:
> Al Getz wrote:
> >
> > Hello there,
> >
> > In light of the open source Eu to come, what do you think is
> > the best way to implement sequences in C (for the interpreter) ?
> >
> >
> > Al
I think the best method is already implemented,
unless you are speaking about extended sequence ops?
Euman
4. Re: Source to come: sequence implementation?
Euman wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 21:31 -0700, Al Getz wrote:
>
> > Al Getz wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello there,
> > >
> > > In light of the open source Eu to come, what do you think is
> > > the best way to implement sequences in C (for the interpreter) ?
> > >
> > >
> > > Al
>
> I think the best method is already implemented,
> unless you are speaking about extended sequence ops?
>
> Euman
>
>
Hi Wayne,
Ok, so what is that then? Anyone care to briefly explain?
I am basically preparing for the possible addition of functions
that act on sequences, yes.
Thanks...
Take care,
Al
E boa sorte com sua programacao Euphoria!
My bumper sticker: "I brake for LED's"
From "Black Knight":
"I can live with losing the good fight,
but i can not live without fighting it".
"Well on second thought, maybe not."
5. Re: Source to come: sequence implementation?
On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 10:41:16 -0400, Euman <Euman at triad.rr.com> wrote:
>unless you are speaking about extended sequence ops?
It will be fun to see how long it takes for someone to rip out
[implicit] sequence ops, so instead of (eg) {1,2,3}+{4,5,6}, you have
to write sq_add({1,2,3},{4,5,6}), so that you can write say
if name="pete" then, vs if equal(name,"pete") then.
Properly, I mean, short circuit evaluation of all expressions, and all
that jazz 
.
Gauntlet down, still beavering away despite the odds,
Regards,
Pete
PS Edita fully working now, getting close to trumping fori benchmark.
6. Re: Source to come: sequence implementation?
>
>
> On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 21:31 -0700, Al Getz wrote:
>
> > Al Getz wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello there,
> > >
> > > In light of the open source Eu to come, what do you think is
> > > the best way to implement sequences in C (for the interpreter) ?
> > >
> > >
> > > Al
>
> I think the best method is already implemented,
> unless you are speaking about extended sequence ops?
Or 8bit or 16bit string chars, perhaps?
Kat
