Re: Source to come: sequence implementation?
On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 10:41:16 -0400, Euman <Euman at triad.rr.com> wrote:
>unless you are speaking about extended sequence ops?
It will be fun to see how long it takes for someone to rip out
[implicit] sequence ops, so instead of (eg) {1,2,3}+{4,5,6}, you have
to write sq_add({1,2,3},{4,5,6}), so that you can write say
if name="pete" then, vs if equal(name,"pete") then.
Properly, I mean, short circuit evaluation of all expressions, and all
that jazz
.
Gauntlet down, still beavering away despite the odds,
Regards,
Pete
PS Edita fully working now, getting close to trumping fori benchmark.
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|