1. Source to come: sequence implementation?
- Posted by Al Getz <Xaxo at aol.com> Oct 13, 2006
- 531 views
Hello there, In light of the open source Eu to come, what do you think is the best way to implement sequences in C (for the interpreter) ? Take care, Al E boa sorte com sua programacao Euphoria! My bumper sticker: "I brake for LED's" From "Black Knight": "I can live with losing the good fight, but i can not live without fighting it". "Well on second thought, maybe not."
2. Re: Source to come: sequence implementation?
- Posted by Al Getz <Xaxo at aol.com> Oct 14, 2006
- 522 views
Al Getz wrote: > > Hello there, > > In light of the open source Eu to come, what do you think is > the best way to implement sequences in C (for the interpreter) ? > > > Al > > E boa sorte com sua programacao Euphoria! > > > My bumper sticker: "I brake for LED's" > Too soon to talk about the source code? Take care, Al E boa sorte com sua programacao Euphoria! My bumper sticker: "I brake for LED's" From "Black Knight": "I can live with losing the good fight, but i can not live without fighting it". "Well on second thought, maybe not."
3. Re: Source to come: sequence implementation?
- Posted by Euman <Euman at triad.rr.com> Oct 14, 2006
- 524 views
On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 21:31 -0700, Al Getz wrote: > Al Getz wrote: > > > > Hello there, > > > > In light of the open source Eu to come, what do you think is > > the best way to implement sequences in C (for the interpreter) ? > > > > > > Al I think the best method is already implemented, unless you are speaking about extended sequence ops? Euman
4. Re: Source to come: sequence implementation?
- Posted by Al Getz <Xaxo at aol.com> Oct 15, 2006
- 510 views
Euman wrote: > > On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 21:31 -0700, Al Getz wrote: > > > Al Getz wrote: > > > > > > Hello there, > > > > > > In light of the open source Eu to come, what do you think is > > > the best way to implement sequences in C (for the interpreter) ? > > > > > > > > > Al > > I think the best method is already implemented, > unless you are speaking about extended sequence ops? > > Euman > > Hi Wayne, Ok, so what is that then? Anyone care to briefly explain? I am basically preparing for the possible addition of functions that act on sequences, yes. Thanks... Take care, Al E boa sorte com sua programacao Euphoria! My bumper sticker: "I brake for LED's" From "Black Knight": "I can live with losing the good fight, but i can not live without fighting it". "Well on second thought, maybe not."
5. Re: Source to come: sequence implementation?
- Posted by Pete Lomax <petelomax at blueyonder.co.uk> Oct 15, 2006
- 498 views
On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 10:41:16 -0400, Euman <Euman at triad.rr.com> wrote: >unless you are speaking about extended sequence ops? It will be fun to see how long it takes for someone to rip out [implicit] sequence ops, so instead of (eg) {1,2,3}+{4,5,6}, you have to write sq_add({1,2,3},{4,5,6}), so that you can write say if name="pete" then, vs if equal(name,"pete") then. Properly, I mean, short circuit evaluation of all expressions, and all that jazz . Gauntlet down, still beavering away despite the odds, Regards, Pete PS Edita fully working now, getting close to trumping fori benchmark.
6. Re: Source to come: sequence implementation?
- Posted by "Kat" <kat12 at coosahs.net> Oct 15, 2006
- 528 views
> > > On Fri, 2006-10-13 at 21:31 -0700, Al Getz wrote: > > > Al Getz wrote: > > > > > > Hello there, > > > > > > In light of the open source Eu to come, what do you think is > > > the best way to implement sequences in C (for the interpreter) ? > > > > > > > > > Al > > I think the best method is already implemented, > unless you are speaking about extended sequence ops? Or 8bit or 16bit string chars, perhaps? Kat