1. Differences between Linux and DOS/WIN
- Posted by Chris Bensler <bensler at telus.net> Jul 24, 2001
- 369 views
Hi, Martin pointed out that my preprocessor doesn't run on Linux. I've read the docs and what not, and I think it should now work, but I don't have Linux, so I'm not really sure what I should be looking for. I know, that Linux uses the '/' instead of '\', and about the executable line "#! .. etc...". are there any other differences I should know? On another point... has anyone successfully installed Corel Linux? I have it, and tried to install it, but it just restarts my computer when it's nearly done, as it's probably supposed to, but then nothing, no linux. It puts me back at my dos prompt and I can't find any trace of Linux installed on my system. No partitions, no disk images, nothing.. Chris
2. Re: Differences between Linux and DOS/WIN
- Posted by pampeano at ROCKETMAIL.COM Jul 24, 2001
- 345 views
Well, if it works on dos and doesn't call any specific dos stuff like graphics_mode that have some differences on linux or call directly to int 21 it should work on linux without modifications. I'll download the preprocessor and look for something that could be causing the problem. I installed Corel Linux succesfully, sometime ago i tried to install it again but had some problems with my hd so decided not to install. Don't know what could be the problem on that one. Best Regards, Guillermo Bonvehi AKA: Caballero Rojo - Knixeur --- Chris Bensler <bensler at telus.net> wrote: > Hi, > > Martin pointed out that my preprocessor doesn't run on Linux. > I've read > the docs and what not, and I think it should now work, but I don't > have > Linux, so I'm not really sure what I should be looking for. > > I know, that Linux uses the '/' instead of '\', and about the > executable line "#! .. etc...". are there any other differences I > should > know? > > On another point... has anyone successfully installed Corel Linux? I > have > it, and tried to install it, but it just restarts my computer when > it's > nearly done, as it's probably supposed to, but then nothing, no > linux. It > puts me back at my dos prompt and I can't find any trace of Linux > installed > on my system. No partitions, no disk images, nothing.. > > Chris
3. Re: Differences between Linux and DOS/WIN
- Posted by irvm at ellijay.com Jul 24, 2001
- 342 views
On Monday 23 July 2001 22:52, Chris Bensler wrote: > On another point... has anyone successfully installed Corel Linux? I have > it, and tried to install it, but it just restarts my computer when it's > nearly done, as it's probably supposed to, but then nothing, no linux. It > puts me back at my dos prompt and I can't find any trace of Linux installed > on my system. No partitions, no disk images, nothing.. I haven't tried Corel, but I'm sure thousands of people have successfully. One thought - somewhere along the line, all installations I've tried have to ask where you want the boot loader to be installed. MBR on the first hard drive is the usual choice. Did you get that far? It appears that the boot loader isn't installed, otherwise you'd get a opportunity to choose DOS or Linux at boot time. (after that, the Linux choice would fail if the Linux partitions weren't there.) Regards, Irv
4. Re: Differences between Linux and DOS/WIN
- Posted by Sabal.Mike at notations.com Jul 24, 2001
- 360 views
Just to add a note: The CD should have a DOS utility called Loadlin.exe. = If you don't have lilo or another boot loader installed, loadlin should be = able to find and launch your Linux OS (you may have to specify the = partition name; i.e., hda1). HTH, Mike Sabal >>> irvm at ellijay.com 07/24/01 11:45AM >>> It appears that the boot loader isn't installed, otherwise you'd get a=20 opportunity to choose DOS or Linux at boot time. =20 (after that, the Linux choice would fail if the Linux partitions weren't=20= there.) Regards, Irv