1. RE: bcd+planck
-------Phoenix-Boundary-07081998-
You wrote on 4/15/02 5:30:45 AM:
> isn't quantum-mech yesterday's stuff now that t=
>he theoretician's are firing at the super-string and great
>unification-theory?
>
SUSY, GUTS and TOE's (Theory Of Everything) are indeed the cutting edge.
They are not expected to invalidate Quantum Mechanics in any way,
but to explain how General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics can both
be true. I would be putting my money (if I had any) on the 'information'
theories (M theory) that see the universe as composed of processes
rather than things. What we see as objects are just information. What
we see as forces are actually information exchanges.
(I am not a scientist and don't know what I'm talking about.)
Karl Bochert
-------Phoenix-Boundary-07081998---
2. RE: bcd+planck
- Posted by a.tammer at hetnet.nl
Apr 17, 2002
hi Karl,
neither am i, (just a former teacher aso aso aso) but i fully second your views.
if you by any chance are German, (your last name suggests so) then i wish you
<viel Glück und Erfolg>.
antoine
3. RE: bcd+planck
On 17 Apr 2002, at 14:27, a.tammer at hetnet.nl wrote:
>
> hi Karl,
>
> neither am i, (just a former teacher aso aso aso) but i fully second your
> views.
> if you by any chance are German, (your last name suggests so) then i wish you
> <viel Glück und Erfolg>.
Many blissfull effects of what? Measuring the universe with an x-ray
microscope? So do i, lol! But seriously, a quick bcd lib is going to be as
useful as classes (if the class lib has tons o'options) and Karl's version(s) of
the interpreter.
Kat
