1. Another OOP library
- Posted by Lewis Townsend <keroltarr at HOTMAIL.COM> Aug 24, 2000
- 492 views
Hello all, I have written an OOP library for Euphoria. I wrote this lib for my own purposes but if anyone is interested in yet another OOP lib then I'll post it. However, before I do, I need some help with naming conventions. I originally named the routines used for retrieving and changing a property as Get() and Set() respectively but realized that this causes a namespace conflict with get.e's Get() routine. I changed my Get() to Read() but that might be hard to remember for users besides the potential conflict with any number of other I/O library routines. I was wondering if anyone has any suggestions for naming these two routines in a way that will be easy to remember, understand, and type with a minimal chance of causing naming conflicts with other include files. TIA and let me know if anyone is possibly interested in this lib. later, Lewis Townsend . __ _____ __ __ __ __ _____ . /\ \ /\ \|\ \ /\ \ /\ \ /\ \ /\ \ . / \_\ / \____\ \_\/ \_\/ \_\/ \_\/ \____\ . / / / / / ___/ | | / | / / / /\ / __ \ . / / / / / /_\ | | | / | / / / /\_\/ /_ \/ ./ / /\ / / ___/ | | |/ | / / / /\ \ \__ \ .\ / /__\\ / /__\ \ | /| |/ /\ / / \/\_\/ / . \/_____/ \/_____/ \|___/\|___/ \/_/ \_____/ keroltarr at hotmail.com http://geocities.com/keroltarr/ ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
2. Re: Another OOP library
- Posted by Kat <gertie at PELL.NET> Aug 24, 2000
- 521 views
On 24 Aug 2000, at 14:31, Lewis Townsend wrote: > Hello all, > > I have written an OOP library for Euphoria. I wrote this lib > for my own purposes but if anyone is interested in yet > another OOP lib then I'll post it. However, before I do, I > need some help with naming conventions. I originally named > the routines used for retrieving and changing a property > as Get() and Set() respectively but realized that this > causes a namespace conflict with get.e's Get() routine. > I changed my Get() to Read() but that might be hard to > remember for users besides the potential conflict with > any number of other I/O library routines. I was wondering if > anyone has any suggestions for naming these two routines in > a way that will be easy to remember, understand, and type > with a minimal chance of causing naming conflicts with other > include files. Try MyOOP_get() and MyOOP_set() ? Kat
3. Re: Another OOP library
- Posted by Bernie <xotron at PCOM.NET> Aug 24, 2000
- 479 views
On Thu, 24 Aug 2000 14:31:02 CDT, Lewis Townsend <keroltarr at HOTMAIL.COM> wrote: >Hello all, > >I have written an OOP library for Euphoria. I wrote this lib >for my own purposes but if anyone is interested in yet >another OOP lib then I'll post it. However, before I do, I >need some help with naming conventions. I originally named >the routines used for retrieving and changing a property >Get() and Set() respectively but realized that this Lewis: Just use Get_() and Set_() Bernie
4. Re: Another OOP library
- Posted by "Hawke'" <mikedeland at NETZERO.NET> Aug 24, 2000
- 497 views
> I was wondering if > anyone has any suggestions for naming these two routines in OOPGet(), OOPSet() ??? getOOP(), setOOP() ??? GetOOP(), SetOOP()??? GET(), SET() ???? after all, EU *is* case sensitive, but mebbe not the best choices... typos and such would get gnarly... Get_OOP(), Set_OOP() ??? OOP_Get(), OOP_Set() ??? --Hawke' ____________NetZero Free Internet Access and Email_________ Download Now http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html Request a CDROM 1-800-333-3633 ___________________________________________________________
5. Re: Another OOP library
- Posted by Dan B Moyer <DANMOYER at PRODIGY.NET> Aug 24, 2000
- 455 views
Kat, <chuckle!> Dan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kat" <gertie at PELL.NET> To: <EUPHORIA at LISTSERV.MUOHIO.EDU> Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2000 12:43 PM Subject: Re: Another OOP library > On 24 Aug 2000, at 14:31, Lewis Townsend wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > I have written an OOP library for Euphoria. I wrote this lib > > for my own purposes but if anyone is interested in yet > > another OOP lib then I'll post it. However, before I do, I > > need some help with naming conventions. I originally named > > the routines used for retrieving and changing a property > > as Get() and Set() respectively but realized that this > > causes a namespace conflict with get.e's Get() routine. > > I changed my Get() to Read() but that might be hard to > > remember for users besides the potential conflict with > > any number of other I/O library routines. I was wondering if > > anyone has any suggestions for naming these two routines in > > a way that will be easy to remember, understand, and type > > with a minimal chance of causing naming conflicts with other > > include files. > > Try MyOOP_get() and MyOOP_set() ? > > Kat
6. Re: Another OOP library
- Posted by Michael Nelson <MichaelANelson at WORLDNET.ATT.NET> Aug 26, 2000
- 486 views
Lewis Townsend wrote: <snip> > I have written an OOP library for Euphoria. I wrote this lib > for my own purposes but if anyone is interested in yet > another OOP lib then I'll post it. </snip> Lewis, I am quite interested in your OOP library--I studied every OOP lib then existing while writing Object Euphoria and want to keep up. Given the quality of your work generally, I expect to be impressed. Please post it, -- Mike Nelson
7. Re: Another OOP library
- Posted by Lewis Townsend <keroltarr at HOTMAIL.COM> Aug 28, 2000
- 507 views
Hello all, Hawke' suggested: OOPGet(), OOPSet() ??? getOOP(), setOOP() ??? GetOOP(), SetOOP()??? GET(), SET() ???? Get_OOP(), Set_OOP() ??? OOP_Get(), OOP_Set() ??? Thanks Hawke' for your suggestions. They got me thinking and I have decided on "oget()" and "oset()". Just 4 characters each and no SHIFT key involved. They SHOULD be easy to remember, the "o" stands for Object... Michael Nelson Wrote: >Lewis, > >I am quite interested in your OOP library--I studied every OOP lib then >existing while writing Object Euphoria and want to keep up. Given the >quality of your work generally, I expect to be impressed. Please post it, Thanks Michael, I don't know what you base my general work quality on since my only significant contribution to date is NeilGUI but thanks anyway ;). I will post the lib very soon. As soon as I write and test a few demo programs. later all, Lewis Townsend. _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com.
8. Re: Another OOP library
- Posted by Michael Nelson <MichaelANelson at WORLDNET.ATT.NET> Aug 29, 2000
- 473 views
Lewis Townsend wrote: <snip>:> > Michael Nelson Wrote: > > >Lewis, > > > >I am quite interested in your OOP library--I studied every OOP lib then > >existing while writing Object Euphoria and want to keep up. Given the > >quality of your work generally, I expect to be impressed. Please post it, > > Thanks Michael, I don't know what you base my general work > quality on since my only significant contribution to date > is NeilGUI but thanks anyway ;). I will post the lib very > soon. As soon as I write and test a few demo programs. Lewis, Neil qualifies you for such praise all by itself just as Win32lib would quailfy David Cuny even if he had had noting to do with equal(). -- Mike
9. Re: Another OOP library
- Posted by Lewis Townsend <keroltarr at HOTMAIL.COM> Aug 29, 2000
- 471 views
Hello All, My OOP lib is now available at my web site: http://geocities.com/keroltarr http://geocities.com/keroltarr/download/LOOP.zip It includes 2 demos and a comprehensive (IMO) HTML readme. If another format is required by anyone let me know. As always let me know what you (all) think about the lib. later, Lewis Townsend. _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com.