Re: Another OOP library

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Kat,

<chuckle!>

Dan

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kat" <gertie at PELL.NET>
To: <EUPHORIA at LISTSERV.MUOHIO.EDU>
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2000 12:43 PM
Subject: Re: Another OOP library


> On 24 Aug 2000, at 14:31, Lewis Townsend wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I have written an OOP library for Euphoria. I wrote this lib
> > for my own purposes but if anyone is interested in yet
> > another OOP lib then I'll post it. However, before I do, I
> > need some help with naming conventions. I originally named
> > the routines used for retrieving and changing a property
> > as Get() and Set() respectively but realized that this
> > causes a namespace conflict with get.e's Get() routine.
> > I changed my Get() to Read() but that might be hard to
> > remember for users besides the potential conflict with
> > any number of other I/O library routines. I was wondering if
> > anyone has any suggestions for naming these two routines in
> > a way that will be easy to remember, understand, and type
> > with a minimal chance of causing naming conflicts with other
> > include files.
>
> Try MyOOP_get() and MyOOP_set() ?
>
> Kat

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu