1. bind vs. interp on Windows 10
- Posted by irv May 27, 2019
- 1445 views
I've noticed a problem, and hope someone can confirm or not.
puts(1,"Hello World!\n")
This, of course, runs instantly. When bound, however, it takes more than 1 second before anything happens. Feels like nearly 2.
Running in compatibilty mode with Windows 7 or 8 makes no difference.
Is my Windows broken? Or does this happen to anyone else?
(Eu 4.1 beta 2)
2. Re: bind vs. interp on Windows 10
- Posted by petelomax May 27, 2019
- 1417 views
Sounds like your av is giving it a once-over, try watching task manager while it happens - windows defender lists as "Antimalware Service Executable".
3. Re: bind vs. interp on Windows 10
- Posted by irv May 27, 2019
- 1432 views
Sounds like your av is giving it a once-over, try watching task manager while it happens - windows defender lists as "Antimalware Service Executable".
I put an extra line into the test:
puts(1,"Hello World!\n") while 1 do end while
So that eu remains running after completing the difficult task of saying hello.
When run via eui hello, the Antimalware isn't triggered, and the memory/cpu load graph remains at a plateau until I kill eu.
When bound and run as hello.exe, the Antimalware is triggered like a college student without a warm puppy. The graph peaks, then settles down to the same even level as before.
It makes sense that Windows sees hello.exe as a foreign (meaning "we didn't sell it") program, and has to check. I suppose the same thing would happen if I wrote hello.c, since Microsoft would be unacquainted with that program, also.
Now, short of using a big hammer, is there any way to turn off the Aunty Mule ware? This computer isn't connected to the web. So I'm not particularly worried about getting a virus.
Edit: there is plenty of complaints on the internet, I'll try some of the suggestions to turn it off. Thanks for pointing me to the cause.
4. Re: bind vs. interp on Windows 10
- Posted by petelomax May 27, 2019
- 1413 views
Open Windows Defender (aka Windows Security), select Virus & threat protection (1st option) /settings (2nd option) /exclusions (5th option).
From there you can add file/folder/file type/process, not that I've tested any.
I suppose the proper way is to exclude build and test, but not release folders.
5. Re: bind vs. interp on Windows 10
- Posted by irv May 27, 2019
- 1394 views
Open Windows Defender (aka Windows Security), select Virus & threat protection (1st option) /settings (2nd option) /exclusions (5th option).
From there you can add file/folder/file type/process, not that I've tested any.
I suppose the proper way is to exclude build and test, but not release folders.
Yes, I tried excluding the file - didn't do any good. I'll try the other ways. Thanks!
6. Re: bind vs. interp on Windows 10
- Posted by irv May 28, 2019
- 1362 views
Thanks. I ran into this problem while trying to find out why EuGTK seems to run more slowly on Windows than on Linux. After inserting some timing statements, I discovered that it isn't really *running* much slower, it's just *starting* slower, which gives the appearance of running more slowly.
The actual times, once Windows decides to let me run my own program, are very close:
| Windows | Linux |
|---|---|
| load Eu includes 0.156 | Load Eu includes 0.3 |
| build interface 0.031 | build interface 0.01 [1] |
| startup GTK 0.813 [2] | startup GTK 0.06 |
| load big file 0.031 | load big file 0.02 |
| total 1.031 sec | total 0.39 |
[1] I was surprised that, as complex as EuGTK is, Euphoria was able to process and link all those GTK calls, set up a registry, and create the various controls in such a short time. Pretty powerful!
[2] While it's obvious that Linux is faster here (since it's working with native shared libraries vs. the GTK shim), nobody would notice the extra six tenths of a sec or so that Windows needs - if that were all that's involved.
All the extra startup (close to 4 sec when bound) seems to be before Euphoria has even started.
