Re: Please help me, who to start (Beginner)
I see, that are good arguments and I must admit, the language by itself realy
seams to be easy. So it´s a pitty to give it up.
But the periphery is so comlicated to handle, that´s very frustrating, when
there is no surface for comming in.
Why euphoria is so hidden in this funtionality?
Why is it possible to open Delpi with a click and you can set buttons and fields
and there is a prepared place for scripting and why doesn`t the same work in
Euphoria?
For example, who want´s nowadays going back to the routs, to learn Dos again?
Not everybody is grown up with that old way to use a computer.
I don´t see, why it should be nessesary to spend time in learning an outmoded
concept?
I like it to use "clicky bunty" and i also have to present programs with
handsome fields an buttons.
Give me a surface like in delphi and a same easy way to get in and I surely
could find many people to convince of Euphoria.
Perhaps Euphoria isn`t that sophisticated and it´s better to wait, till it will
be growing up out of the range of hackers?
Cheers,
Uwe
Vincent wrote:
> Sorry to see you leave... Euphoria is the easiest programming language I have
> ever used. Delphi, while nice, is very expensive costing up to $3,000 for the
> Architect version of the IDE+compiler. Euphoria is free and open-source,
> expect
> for the translator, binder, and fast C backend source... but even all that is
> only $167 USD, with one free upgrade then the rest forever at upgrade price.
>
> Alot of people dont need those products, so everything is free lunch for them.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Vincent
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
