Re: Item limit on List control

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Looks like I am just going to have to do something different . . . Hmmm. . .

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ted Fines" <fines at macalester.edu>
To: "EUforum" <EUforum at topica.com>
Subject: Re: Item limit on List control


>
>
> Hmmm... How about creating several, organizing them like:
> A-D is in listbox1
> E-L is in listbox2
> ...and so on...
> This can be troublesome, especially with something like names, as there
are
> a large number of last names beginning with J, few with U, etc. etc.
>
> Or, you could determine the number of list boxes needed dynamically by
> dividing the number of entries by 32,767, and using that result+1 for the
> number of list boxes.
>
> 32,767 sure is a huge number of items to put in a list box...Might want to
> think about a different way to do whatever you're doing...
>
> Ted
>
> --On Sunday, April 22, 2001 10:40 PM -0600 jjnick at cvn.com wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > Feeling blue about the state of your email inbox? Then
> > you'll be tickled pink to hear about our free email
> > organization solution. Learn more at
> >
> >
> > Da*n, just hit the 32,767 limit for items in a list control!  Anyway
> > around this?
> >
> > API snippet:
> >
> >
> > Windows 95 only: The wParam parameter is limited to 16-bit values. This
> > means list boxes cannot contain more than 32,767 items. Although the
> > number of items is restricted, the total size in bytes of the items in a
> > listbox is limited only by available memory.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu