OpenEuphoria

Re: Standardisation between Win libraries

• Posted by Juergen Luethje <j.lue at gmx.de> Jul 26, 2003
• 490 views

Hello Peter, you wrote:

> Just my take on this subject,
>
>    Choice is good !
>
>    Take a look at the windows platform and see what happens when
>    there is just one option. If you need other functionality or
>    options, you are out of luck.
>
>    For example, I've just switched my windows machines from using
>    the windows shell (explorer) to using Litestep instead. Now, for
>    Litestep there are several desktop modules, tasktray modules,
>    menu modules, etc. to choose from. Each with different options
>    and functionality. It takes some time to figure out which ones
>    you want to use, but in the end you get (close to) exactly what
>    YOU want.
>
>    I think the same goes for the Euphoria libraries: choice is good !
>
>    So my vote is "Please DON'T merge them into one".

Yep, I totally agree.
But please note, that modularity (if possible) increases the number of
choices. 

Best regards,
   Juergen

-- 
Math problems? Call 1-800-[(10x)(13i)^2]-[sin(xy)/2.362x].