Re:
- Posted by Euman <euman at bellsouth.net> Apr 01, 2001
- 1759 views
I've got a 40 meg and growing database and havent run into a problem useing Win98, Win32Lib and EDS..... I just recently read that Win ME had no DOS support so I asked if it would function and several people said it would.... EDS is really nice if used (handled) proper I converted 3.8 megs of Dbase .dbf .dbt files over to EDS and saved alittle under 2 meg space. Euman ----- Original Message ----- From: "Derek Parnell" <ddparnell at bigpond.com> To: "EUforum" <EUforum at topica.com> Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2001 22:05 Subject: RE: Re: > > > Yeah, go for it. Euphoria with Win32lib and EDS could handle this task > easily. The performance would be quite acceptable using a PC from the last 3 > years. (P2, 8Meg RAM, 200Meg disk, Windows 98) > > I have an application using EDS, Win32lib that is much more demanding than > the one you outlined. (60 concurrent client machines handling the UI and a > single server handling the Database) (Sorry, source and object code not > available as it proprietary and I'm operating under a non-disclosure > agreement). > > ----------- > cheers, > Derek Parnell > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: chris_esen at hotmail.com [mailto:chris_esen at hotmail.com] > > Sent: Monday, 2 April 2001 12:42 PM > > To: EUforum > > Subject: RE: Re: > > > > > > > > Hey - > > > > I'm working on a database program with 300+ fields for each > > individual. > > I suspect an average of 25 individuals to be entered into the > > database > > at once. It's not a complicated program at all. Basicly I'm going to > > sort >all< of this information after I compare it against the other > > individual's fields, then display the top N winners for each > > group (each > > group has a table). Now there's more to it, like some individuals may > > not have groups while others will and blah blah blah. The rest of the > > program sets the MAX and MIN limit for the information being entered > > into the fields. It's gonna be chock full of UI. > > > > Later, > > Chris > > > > > > >