Re: 2 Pass Binder
- Posted by bytebrain <bytebrain at MINDSPRING.COM> Aug 18, 1999
- 424 views
-------Phoenix-Boundary-07081998- Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: Quoted-printable Robert Craig wrote: >Craig writes: > Does a 2 pass binding process offer the possibility of > forward referencing without routine_id()=3F > On second thought, that would cause some divisiveness > between code intended for registered/nonregistered > use, wouldn't it=3F > >The goal here is to make all programs bindable, >and to optimize things a bit. >If I wanted to allow forward referencing I >could do it very easily in the interpreter. Ah, I see. Toldja I didn't know squat about interpreters; this proves it :). >I happen to believe that the lack of (easy) >forward referencing is ultimately good for your sanity >and the sanity of the person trying to understand >your code. Agreed, completely. My question wasn't a veiled request for forward referencing; just curiosity, which has now been satisfied. Thanks, Craig -------------------------------------------- A statistician can have his head in an oven and his feet in ice, and he will say that on the average he feels fine. -- Anonymous -------Phoenix-Boundary-07081998---