RE: [OT] Interesting?
- Posted by Al Getz <Xaxo at aol.com> Jul 20, 2003
- 536 views
rforno at tutopia.com wrote: > > > Please check Scientific American February 1963 for an article on this > subject. > Regards. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Dan Moyer <DANIELMOYER at prodigy.net> > Subject: Re: [OT] Interesting? > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Al Getz" <Xaxo at aol.com> > > To: "EUforum" <EUforum at topica.com> > > Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 1:07 PM > > Subject: RE: [OT] Interesting? > > > > > > > 1evan at sbcglobal.net wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.earth360.com/math-naturesnumbers.html > > > > > > > > > > > Howdy, > > > > > > > > > THE SQUARE TRIANGLE > > > > > > > > > Now for something more serious (ha ha), here are some counter points... > > > > > <snip>> > > > > > > > > > You can probably use a triangular bit to drill a round hole, but > > > ever try to drill a triangular hole? > > > > Well, I've seen "drills" which can drill SQUARE holes, so I don't > > suppose > it > > would be completely impossible to make a variant which could drill a > > triangular one! :) > > > > Dan Moyer > > > > ps. the "drill", mounted in a drill press, is actually an assemblege of > > a > > hollow NON-ROTATING square "pipe" with sharp edges at the bottom, with a > > regular drill INSIDE it, presumably sticking some distance down from the > > bottom of the hollow square pipe, such that the drill drills a round > > hole > > almost the size of the square, the pipe's sharp edges then chisels out > > the > > remaining wood as the drill is advanced through it. Might not work so > well > > for a triangle, as there would be more wood left in the corners of a > > triangular hole than in the corners of a square one. > > > > > > <snip> > > > Take care for now, > > > Al > > > > > > > > > TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE! > > > > > > > TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE! > > > > Hello, Ok, if i can find it. Take care, Al