Re: EuDesk going to be Shutdown
Tristen Wilson wrote:
>
> I did not expect everyone to "Jump to it", and the initial design may be
> flawed
> as I don't see how you can use Euphoria to Call Windows Routines under DOS
> (Which would be the lowest level of EuDesk) However, Writing a DOS based OS
> in euphoria would probably be more realistic than a completly EUphoria
> based OS.
Well, you never really did anything, but asked for help, and implied that
CK's bounty site would enable people to pay (I'm assuming, based on your
comment--because you could have simply offered up something--that you
weren't planning to offer any bounties) for bounties to get the project
off the ground.
Do you have any other work to share besides what you've said on this forum?
It's not clear to me (and probably for others) what the benefits of this
project would be. What sort of features are you thinking about? Can you
compare this to anything currently in existence?
I guess we have different ideas of what an OS is. Are you talking about
writing some sort of a window manager? Or were you planning on rewriting
command.com and friends in euphoria?
Given what we've heard so far, I wouldn't even classify this as vaporware.
Matt
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
