Re: pretty_print bug
- Posted by "Juergen Luethje" <j.lue at gmx.de> Jun 28, 2004
- 452 views
Pete wrote: > On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 10:17:25 -0700, Robert Craig wrote: <snip> >> It's not my intention to make pretty_print() do all things >> for all people. I'm just trying to cover simple, common cases, >> and I'm trying to keep the documentation and the code >> reasonably short and understandable. > Absolutely agree, 100%. > >> If you want to add >> a bell or whistle to pretty_print(), you can copy it >> and edit it to your heart's content. > Ditto, this is trivial. > > However, I do want to stress: Anyone bar Rob making changes to > Euphoria\include\misc.e\pretty_print() itself I would *STRONGLY* > discourage. There is nothing like making such a change to your own > machine and then weeks, months, or years later wondering why the same > program fails miserably on an apparently identical machine. > > Editing a *copy* of that file is, of course, fine. <snip> Obviously, you didn't want to say it yourself, but I'll do so: A very good replacement for preetty_print() is of course your 'ppp.e'. Pete, I suggest to put it on the User Contributions page. Also, Derek recently released his 'print.e' (which I haven't tried yet). Regards, Juergen