Re: [OT] Interesting?
- Posted by gertie at visionsix.com Jul 18, 2003
- 493 views
On 18 Jul 2003, at 14:35, Carl W. wrote: > > > 1evan at sbcglobal.net wrote: > > > http://www.earth360.com/math-naturesnumbers.html > > [Warning: I'm shooting from the hip here.] > > Eeesh. That looked a lot like near-religious crankism to me. > > The arguments in that page would have been better if they had been > introduced on several pages rather than in one big rant. > > A menu to those pages would have been good too. e.g. > * Dozenal - Why I think it's a good base > * A dozenal notation system - could these be nature's numbers? > * The human body and dozenal. > * Other numberical bases and their uses in history. > * etc. > > Also; If you're trying to make a serious argument, you don't use bright > yellow as your background colour... I didn't see the yellow. But they used the alledged word "forebears", which means nothing to me. All it could mean is "the the bear that came first". Now, "forebearers" is a different word, and does make sense. Kat