Re: [OT] Interesting?

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

On 18 Jul 2003, at 14:35, Carl W. wrote:

> 
> 
> 1evan at sbcglobal.net wrote:
> 
> > http://www.earth360.com/math-naturesnumbers.html
> 
> [Warning: I'm shooting from the hip here.]
> 
> Eeesh. That looked a lot like near-religious crankism to me.
> 
> The arguments in that page would have been better if they had been 
> introduced on several pages rather than in one big rant.
> 
> A menu to those pages would have been good too. e.g.
> * Dozenal - Why I think it's a good base
> * A dozenal notation system - could these be nature's numbers?
> * The human body and dozenal.
> * Other numberical bases and their uses in history.
> * etc.
> 
> Also; If you're trying to make a serious argument, you don't use bright 
> yellow as your background colour...

I didn't see the yellow. But they used the alledged word "forebears", which
means
nothing to me. All it could mean is "the the bear that came first". Now, 
"forebearers" is a different word, and does make sense.

Kat

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu