Re: Integer() operation on a sequence?
Michael Raley wrote:
>
>
> Derek Parnell wrote:
> >
> > Michael Raley wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > not too suprisingly I cannot do this
> > What were you expecting to achieve?
> As I stated in the example with integer,
> to apply the test to a slice of elements
> and return a sequence of True/False values.
> i.e (1,0,0,1,1,0)
> >
> > What I'm trying to say is that you could try out writing your own function
> > first and if that is not ever going to be fast enough for your needs,
> > then you could lobby RDS for a new built-in routine.
> >
> Yes I could, but I think the functionality has as much broader merit as
> current native functions and should at least be mentioned.
My previous reply was incomplete because I pressed the TAB key followed
by the ENTER key, thus causing focus to move the the 'Send Now' button
and sending it. Robert/Junko: Maybe this is a minor GUI issue you can tweak.
Anyhow, back to the thread...
What is the difference between ...
s = integers({2.4, 1, 0, 3.22, -5})
for i = 1 to length(s) do
if s[i] then
...
end if
end for
and
s = {2.4, 1, 0, 3.22, -5}
for i = 1 to length(s) do
if integer(s[i]) then
...
end if
end for
--
Derek Parnell
Melbourne, Australia
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|