OpenEuphoria

Re: Stupid Newbie-sounding question.

• Posted by Pete Lomax <petelomax at blueyonder.co.uk> Jun 02, 2004
• 537 views

On Wed, 02 Jun 2004 04:34:18 -0700, Matt Lewis
<guest at RapidEuphoria.com> wrote:

>Derek Parnell wrote:
>> use it. Making it 50% slower would still leave it more than fast enough.
>> irv mullins wrote:
>slowed down, I'd have to stop using Euphoria for these tasks (yes,
>even running on 3Ghz machines).
>I'm sure I'm in the minority on this (although going by User Contributions,
>not totally alone), but thought I'd speak up for those of us for whom 
>speed still matters.

As I said before, I'll agree with an argument against this on
technical grounds. Non-string Eu is perfectly useable, and wonderfully
fast. I might favour string handling, but it is votes what count.

Regards,
Pete
PS I can be bribed )