Re: Stupid Newbie-sounding question.
>From: Derek Parnell <guest at RapidEuphoria.com>
>Subject: Re: Stupid Newbie-sounding question.
> > So does that mean we peek and poke everything directly to memory?
> > None of those fancy atoms for me! I like dealing with my floats in raw
> > IEEE form!
>
>Now you're getting it 
>
>But seriously, folks... the current internal structures used by Euphoria
>mean that it is quick for Euphoria to distinguish between integers, atoms,
>and sequences, but if you add any more 'native' types, things are going
>to slow down a lot.
That's fine, we have integers, atoms, and sequences... but we can't easily
know what is inside a sequence. I'm not trying to add any more native
things.
MrTrick
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
