Re: Moving on...

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

> From: jbrown105 at speedymail.org
> Subject: Re: Moving on...
> 
> 
> On Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 12:08:44AM +0000, Ray Smith wrote:
> 
>> 
>> jbrown105 at speedymail.org wrote:
>> 
> 
>> > There is the OpenEuphoria movement. Why has no one even mentioned that?
>> > There is working being done on making a compatible open source core for
>> > those librarys ... if what you say is true then when this is done the OE
>> > community will become very popular quickly.
> 
>> 
>> Yes, I think if an Open Source Euphoria existed, this would become the
>> building blocks of many great additions which would make Euphoria far 
>> far more popular.  I'd be back to programming Euphoria full time if
>> an Open Source Euphoria existed.
> 
> 
> Well I'm working on it. (An open source OE translator, working on the runtime
> library atm.)
> 
> 
>> > However, while there was a lot of initial interest, the movement has 
>> > slowed
>> > quite a bit. Apparently there isn't a huge amount of interest in having
>> > Euphora Open source after all...
> 
>> 
>> I haven't seen any real progress with OpenEU in almost a year.  At the
>> current rate it looks like it would take up to 5 years to get even 
>> close to the current "offifical Euphoria".  It might be too late in 5
>> years for it to make a difference???
>> 

Ray, I'm sure that, if you joined the OE effort, the 5 years span wouod 
narrow down to a manageable 2 or 3 years ! Step in !


> 
> The interest on OE died a bit with the dropping of PEU (which is not really
> true
> even - my runtime lib "borrows" a great deal of code from PEU, tho it is
> considerably cleaned up).
> 
> I'm hoping, when I finish my translator, it will rise up again. (But right now
> I'm using my "made up" OE specs, since Derek and CChris havent produced me
> an official OE standard v0.1 yet -- but no rush guys ;)
> 

	Quite a few descriptions of aspects of OE and the expected features ie 
in the "description" posts I posted on OpenEu. Due to the general lack 
of comments, I don't know if there is broad agreement, broad 
disagreement or anything in between about them.
	Additionally, a voting system had been put forth to select priorities 
and make some decisions. As of today, they were 4 votes. I was wondering 
if it is wise to star writing solid specs on such material. I frrl Derek 
has to send some signal to us about that.
	I'm taking a two week leave without any Internet connection.
	Keep on the good work!

CChris

>> 
>> Ray Smith
>> http://rays-web.com
>> 
> 
> jbrown,
> tired
> 
> 
>> TOPICA - Start your

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu