RE: Eu's poor design(Irv)
- Posted by eugtk at yahoo.com
Aug 17, 2003
--- Deric Wechter <dericwechter at netscape.net> wrote:
> Thanks for clarifying about the design flaw.
>
> For me, I've found Euphoria has become my choice for
> making quick "hack" programs to accomplish
> something specific. I've been using it a bit over a
year > now but just recently I've begun to get a lot
more into
> it.
... snip...
> Still, all in all I really love Euphoria and I hope
> it continues evolving and becoming an even better
> product than it is currently.
Indeed, that's why I post messages about things that
need improving, instead of just going away, as many
have done. I think it makes Rob angry to read these,
but,
hey, Euphoria is a programming language, a product
Rob sells, not one of his children. No point in being
sensitive about criticism, especially when that
criticism is meant to be constructive.
> I also wanted to take a minute to thank all of the
people involved
> with Win32Lib and IDE development. They're
fantastic free contributions that
> have greatly enhanced the usefuless of the language
for Windows development.
It would no doubt be a dead language without Dave
Cuny, Derek, Judith, and all the others who made it
work on Windows. Just another reason we should try
to make Eu wildly popular, so those people could share
in the profits:)
Regards,
Irv
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
