RE: Eu's poor design

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message 

Juergen Luethje wrote:
> 
> 
> Andreas Rumpf wrote:
> 
> > Peter Willems wrote:
> 
> [Call by Reference]
> 
> >>    And the lack of such an option doesn't mean you can't write
> >>    serious or professional applications with it.
> > Well, agreed, you CAN, but you probably won't.
> 
> Regardless whether you can imagine that or not --
> it already _has_ been done.
Well once there was written plenty of asm, and believe it or not, it 
_has_ been done and it worked. So what? Should we program in asm any 
longer? Certainly not. So where is your point? I already said that it 
can be done without cbr, it is just much harder.

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu