RE: Moving on...
- Posted by Kenneth Roger <kennethroger at comcast.net> Aug 14, 2003
- 542 views
> libraries are no substitute for support within the language itself > Irv If you count the standard library as being "within the language" that is certainly true. When C became popular, every compiler included console functions such as getch(), gotoxy(), putpixel(), and clrscr(). These were left out of the 'Standard C Library' leaving only teletype primitives and that cost C portability and popularity. On the Euphoria front, though, I like the language clean and pretty much as it is. One of its strengths is that it doesn't have a designed-by-committee architecture. Isn't Java an 80Mb download now?