OpenEuphoria

Re: Modified Interpreter

• Posted by Derek Parnell <ddparnell at bigpond.com> Jul 13, 2003
• 456 views

----- Original Message -----=20
From: "Pete Lomax" <petelomax at blueyonder.co.uk>
To: "EUforum" <EUforum at topica.com>
Subject: Re: Modified Interpreter


>=20
>=20
> On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 12:55:59 -0400, jbrown105 at speedymail.org wrote:
>=20
> >We could just say that 'execute()' is not supported by the =
translator, but
> >RC has already gone on record saying that he doesn't like that idea.
> >(iirc anyways).
>=20
> Or maybe RC hinted he didn't fancy binding in the translator and a
> suitable C compiler along with the translated code, can't imagine why
> not 
>=20

But what about binding in the interpreter so your complied Eu programs =
could interpret Eu code in strings?

It depends on the model of execute() that is chosen - does the executed =
code have access to the same symbols as the calling program or not.

--=20
Derek