Re: Interpreter Mod We Can All Get Behind
- Posted by Jason Gade <jaygade at y?hoo.com> Nov 21, 2007
- 633 views
CChris wrote: > Wouldn't > ++ -- by itself on a line, with an optional comment > whatever text you may come up with > scanning several lines > and which the @#}{} interpreter will happily ignore. > You noticed that leading whitespace doesn't count. > ++ -- again by itself with an optional comment > be nice? > > Aren't we all using syntax highlighting when programming? It is not strictly > necessary, of course - we could also code using a stiletto and clay tablets, > after all. The highlighting will immediately tell you you are in a block > comment. > Coding technology has improved since the days of PL/1. > > CChris Well, I usually use Vim. I guess that you could compare that with using a stylus and clay tablets ;) But I use it with syntax highlighting as well. For block comment, my vote would be this notation: --* block comment --* or even better: --/ block comment --/ Hmm. Yeah. I have no strong opinion as to whether it should implemented, but I like how that looks. I had been thinking of this as well: --/ block comment /-- Whichever. -- A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that works. --John Gall's 15th law of Systemantics. "Premature optimization is the root of all evil in programming." --C.A.R. Hoare j.