Re: Interpreter Mod We Can All Get Behind
	
	
	
	
CChris wrote:
> Wouldn't
>    ++ -- by itself on a line, with an optional comment
> whatever text you may come up with
> scanning several lines
> and which the @#}{} interpreter will happily ignore.
> You noticed that leading whitespace doesn't count.
> ++ -- again by itself with an optional comment
> be nice?
> 
> Aren't we all using syntax highlighting when programming? It is not strictly
> necessary, of course - we could also code using a stiletto and clay tablets,
> after all. The highlighting will immediately tell you you are in a block
> comment.
> Coding technology has improved since the days of PL/1.
> 
> CChris
Well, I usually use Vim. I guess that you could compare that with using a stylus
and clay tablets ;)
But I use it with syntax highlighting as well.
For block comment, my vote would be this notation:
--* block comment --*
or even better:
--/ block comment --/
Hmm. Yeah. I have no strong opinion as to whether it should implemented, but I
like how that looks.
I had been thinking of this as well:
--/ block comment /--
Whichever.
--
A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple
system that works.
--John Gall's 15th law of Systemantics.
"Premature optimization is the root of all evil in programming."
--C.A.R. Hoare
j.
	
	
		| 
									Not Categorized, Please Help
						 |  |