OpenEuphoria

Re: Modified Interpreter

• Posted by jbrown105 at speedymail.org Jul 12, 2003
• 481 views

On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 02:36:02PM +0400, Igor Kachan wrote:
> 
> 
> Hello Derek,
> 
> 
> [big snip]
> > I take it back. Now I'm *sure* you have no understanding of the rules.
> 
> What rules, official rules, or Matt's rules?
> I understand both, but I do not like them both.
> 
> > It seems that you are saying that Euphoria should issue 
> >  an error message when the b.e file tries to declare a 
> >  global 'z', because a.e has already defined 'z'.
> 
> No, not just 'z' , but because a.e has already defined *GLOBAL* 'z'.
> 
> I think, there must be an error message or a warning message, yes,
> from the b.e file.

I prefer a warning to an error, myself.

Its only an error if 'z' is called w/o a namespace prefix ... thats
when we don't know which 'z' to use.

Or are you saying you also want it to be an error when 2 globals of the
same name are declared and neither are in namespaces?

jbrown

> 
> > Is this the problem that you see?
> 
> With my corrections, yes it is.
> 
> > -- 
> > Derek
> > 
> 
> Regards,
> Igor Kachan
> kinz at peterlink.ru
> 
> 
> 
> TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
> 
> 

-- 
 /"\  ASCII ribbon              | http://www.geocities.com/jbrown1050/
 \ /  campain against           | Linux User:190064
  X   HTML in e-mail and        | Linux Machine:84163
 /*\  news, and unneeded MIME   | http://verify.stanford.edu/evote.html