Re: For loops
CChris wrote:
>
> Pete Lomax wrote:
> >
> > I still say that adding a new for_existing construct now seems pointless.
> >
>
> Well, I'm not a staunch supporter of this. It was just the most consistent way
> imho to accommodate requests that were made. We can decide that the while loop
> is good enough for these cases - though using the same construct for many
> different
> purposes doesn't help writing clearer code.
I think that there's a legitimate place for something like the C-style
for-loop. It gives us a fairly well structured while loop that I think
makes for clearer code, since the mechanics of the loop are declared
before hand, but you have much greater freedom in choosing your method
of iteration and termination.
Matt
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|