Re: For loops

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

CChris wrote:
> 
> Pete Lomax wrote:
> > 
> > I still say that adding a new for_existing construct now seems pointless.
> > 
> 
> Well, I'm not a staunch supporter of this. It was just the most consistent way
> imho to accommodate requests that were made. We can decide that the while loop
> is good enough for these cases - though using the same construct for many
> different
> purposes doesn't help writing clearer code.

I think that there's a legitimate place for something like the C-style 
for-loop.  It gives us a fairly well structured while loop that I think
makes for clearer code, since the mechanics of the loop are declared 
before hand, but you have much greater freedom in choosing your method
of iteration and termination.

Matt

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu