OpenEuphoria

Re: Modified Interpreter

• Posted by Igor Kachan <kinz at peterlink.ru> Jul 12, 2003
• 465 views

Hello Pete,
----------
> On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 13:48:14 +0400, Igor Kachan <kinz at peterlink.ru>
> wrote:
> 
> >So, there is no problem with any transformations of this code.
> 
> Good. Try this (on either standard Eu 2.4 or Matts):
> 
> a.e:
> global integer z
> z=1
> include b.e as b
> include c.e as c
> include z.e as d
> ?{z,b:z,c:z,d:z}
> 
> b.e:
> global integer z
> z=2
> include a.e as a
> include c.e as c
> include z.e as d
> ?{a:z,z,c:z,d:z}
> 
> c.e:
> global integer z
> z=3
> include a.e as a
> include b.e as b
> include z.e as d
> ?{a:z,b:z,z,d:z}
> 
> z.e:
> global integer z
> z=4
> include a.e as a
> include b.e as b
> include c.e as c
> ?{a:z,b:z,c:z,z}
> 
> As expected (well, actually, I wasn't too sure about re-including the
> calling program, but I am now) this gives no errors and prints:
> 
> {1,2,3,4}
> {1,2,3,4}
> {1,2,3,4}
> {1,2,3,4}
> 
> Cool, huh?

Cool, yes, but I wonder why my proggy
prints:

 1
 2 
 3 

and what z=3,  of my a.e, of my b.e or of my c.e  


> Regards,
> Pete
> PS I really quite like this example, you 
>  can run any of a.e, b.e, c.e,
> or z.e and get exactly the same result !

I love your example too, I'll run it and kiss it tonight,
but I still wonder why my proggy prints:

1
2
3

and what ....

Regards,
Igor Kachan
kinz at peterlink.ru