OpenEuphoria

Re: Modified Interpreter

• Posted by Pete Lomax <petelomax at blueyonder.co.uk> Jul 12, 2003
• 473 views

On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 13:48:14 +0400, Igor Kachan <kinz at peterlink.ru>
wrote:

>So, there is no problem with any transformations of this code.

Good. Try this (on either standard Eu 2.4 or Matts):

a.e:
global integer z
z=3D1
include b.e as b
include c.e as c
include z.e as d
?{z,b:z,c:z,d:z}

b.e:
global integer z
z=3D2
include a.e as a
include c.e as c
include z.e as d
?{a:z,z,c:z,d:z}

c.e:
global integer z
z=3D3
include a.e as a
include b.e as b
include z.e as d
?{a:z,b:z,z,d:z}

z.e:
global integer z
z=3D4
include a.e as a
include b.e as b
include c.e as c
?{a:z,b:z,c:z,z}

As expected (well, actually, I wasn't too sure about re-including the
calling program, but I am now) this gives no errors and prints:

{1,2,3,4}
{1,2,3,4}
{1,2,3,4}
{1,2,3,4}

Cool, huh?

Regards,
Pete
PS I really quite like this example, you can run any of a.e, b.e, c.e,
or z.e and get exactly the same result !