OpenEuphoria

Re: Comments on ORAC

• Posted by Mike <vulcan at ?in.co?nz> Nov 10, 2007
• 611 views

Pete Lomax wrote:
> 
> Obviously this is all just my opinion, and when it comes across as harsh, that
> is probably just because it is 
> 

-- snip

> 5) Improved syntax:
>     Dot notation. We like.
>     Indirect routine calls:
>       I think you missed a trick here.
>       Impossible from a pre-processor angle, but what if routine_id did +1,
>       and c_func/c_proc did +1 on the _same_ counter? Therefore c_func would
>       be the faster/better route, missing a wrapping level, but call_func 
>       would (accept one sequence parameter and) achieve the same result?

Pete,

FYI

This is working now In Orac. I couldn't detect any increase in parsing time
either 
However, I've restricted it to work only for constants that are associated with
functions that eventually lead back to the specific machine_func() call that
links to a dll. I'll send an update to the Recent Contributions page in a few
days.
Some may find it useful..

Mike