Re: Another look on namespaces
>
>>
>> On Fri, 11 Jul 2003 08:14:55 -0400, Matt Lewis
>> <matthewwalkerlewis at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>
>> >> From: Derek Parnell [mailto:ddparnell at bigpond.com]
>
>> >
>> >> Matt,
>> >> of course I support your implementation of this idea, as this
>> >> is exactly the idea I suggested on the 4/Jul in the openEu
>> >> forum [just so I get some credit 
]
>
>> >
>> >Sorry, not trying to take credit for any ideas. I was away over the weekend
>> >(4-7 July for the American holiday plus a friend's wedding) and, of course,
>> >overwhelmed by the volume of messages from euforum and openeu. The message
>> >that caught my attention was Pete's, referencing a May post by Mike Nelson.
>
I think I was the first to expose this scheme on OpenEu, complete with
the phrase "including tree" and management function for these all too
global symbols from vintage Eu code. Just forgot the reverse inclusion
thing, which Eu supports and is probably useful.
I don't really care about the credits, and even less as I did not code
any source about it. The important thing is to have a language which is
*really* modular and easy to use.
>>
>> Yeah. Careful tea-leaf, or I might just remind everyone about the
>> throw-away line just before our introduction to the infamous Alice,
>> Bob, Chris, and Diane
>>
>> http://www.listfilter.com/cgi-bin/esearch.exu?fromMonth=5&fromYear=8&toMonth=5&toYear=8&postedBy=Derek&keywords=unambiguously
>>
>> [oops )]
>
>
> Thanks, I guess. It seems that I misunderstood your earlier posts. I didn't
> realize you were talking about this situation. I thought you were trying to solve
> a different problem. Sorry.
>
> BTW, what's the "tea-leaf" all about?
>
> -- Derek
CChris
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
