Re: CGI vs Server
Daniel
Pls feel encouraged
--
David Jarvis
On 3 Oct 2003 at 13:36, codepilot at netzero.net wrote:
>
>
> This is daniel kluss,
> the server I made is pretty nice for example code,
> and very stable for a file server, but the cgi is kinda slow, but it is in
> apache too.
> If I get a little encouragement, and free time I'll release the dos server,
> with features:
> long file names
> atapi interface
> builtin euphoria interpreter for cgi
> fast tcp/ip through packet drivers
> and all made in euphoria and asm
>
> Daniel Kluss
> xerox_irs at lvcm.com
> xerox_irs at hotmail.com
> codepilot at netzero.net
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "C. K. Lester" <euphoric at cklester.com>
> To: "EUforum" <EUforum at topica.com>
> Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 5:01 PM
> Subject: CGI vs Server
>
>
> > Okay, looking at the library of available CGI/Server code, I've got a
> > question:
> >
> > The server code (like from Kluss, Blue) would actually be used in place
> > of Apache, right? Are these libraries "secure," like Apache is, or
> > should that even be a concern? Advantages of using an open source
> > EUPHORIA server vs. Apache would be that it is highly-customizable.
> > Disadvantages would be...?
> >
> > I've got a FreeBSD box set up that I can use as a server, as opposed to
> > the host I have now where I couldn't run my own server (I'm guessing).
> > So, what should I run on my box? Is Apache customizable enough that I
> > should go with it?
> >
> > Thanks!
> > -ck
> >
> >
> > TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
> >
> >
> --^----------------------------------------------------------------
> This email was sent to: davidj at ultrasmart.org
>
>
> TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
>
>
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
