Re: CGI vs Server
This is daniel kluss,
the server I made is pretty nice for example code,
and very stable for a file server, but the cgi is kinda slow, but it is in
apache too.
If I get a little encouragement, and free time I'll release the dos server,
with features:
long file names
atapi interface
builtin euphoria interpreter for cgi
fast tcp/ip through packet drivers
and all made in euphoria and asm
Daniel Kluss
xerox_irs at lvcm.com
xerox_irs at hotmail.com
codepilot at netzero.net
----- Original Message -----
From: "C. K. Lester" <euphoric at cklester.com>
To: "EUforum" <EUforum at topica.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 5:01 PM
Subject: CGI vs Server
>
>
> Okay, looking at the library of available CGI/Server code, I've got a
> question:
>
> The server code (like from Kluss, Blue) would actually be used in place
> of Apache, right? Are these libraries "secure," like Apache is, or
> should that even be a concern? Advantages of using an open source
> EUPHORIA server vs. Apache would be that it is highly-customizable.
> Disadvantages would be...?
>
> I've got a FreeBSD box set up that I can use as a server, as opposed to
> the host I have now where I couldn't run my own server (I'm guessing).
> So, what should I run on my box? Is Apache customizable enough that I
> should go with it?
>
> Thanks!
> -ck
>
>
>
> TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
>
>
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
