OpenEuphoria

Re: Euphoria 2.4 Official Release

• Posted by gertie at visionsix.com Jul 09, 2003
• 572 views

On 8 Jul 2003, at 23:56, jbrown105 at speedymail.org wrote:

> 
> 
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 10:19:08PM -0500, gertie at visionsix.com wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 8 Jul 2003, at 22:41, jbrown105 at speedymail.org wrote:
> > 
> > <snip>
> > 
> > > I wrote a sort of one on apache, that works fine. The catch is that it is
> > > horribly difficult to debug.
> > > 
> > > I wrote it for her, but then she says she doesn't want it. 
> > 
> > I don't see it working. Where is it? Show me. What's the url?
> > 
> 
> I tested it on a local apache thats not exposed to the internet (due to
> ISP restrictions). I could show it to you in action tho, you'd just need
> a shell account on my local system.

I need a shell account on a provider company other than a personal 
computer.
 
> > > And yet she
> > > still complains about not having one...even tho one is available. I have
> > > said multiple times that it is working. She doesn't even bother to reply
> > > when I say that.
> > 
> > I ask you every time where it is. It has not worked for me. You sent me code
> > several times, i pointed out the bugs that kept it from working. Then the
> > shell you guys were using stopped letting me log in, and i gave you the
> > passwords to the account. I still do NOT have a WORKING proxy.
> 
> I could show you the code and have you point out more bugs ... except that
> would go against the "fully tested" clause i suppose, eh?

If it is not working, darned right.

> I'll set it up and give it a full test later tonight (or perhaps early
> tomorrow
> morning) just to see how it fares. If you are still interested in the program
> then email me privately and I'll try to arrange a full demonstration of the
> program for you (i.e. give you a shell account and everything).
> 
> > 
> > > I'll give the code to anyone else who wants to give it a go, however.
> > > (It'll
> > > prolly end up public domain.)
> > > 
> > > >   * a simple method for her to tell it when she is online or offline. *
> > > >   a
> > > >   method for her to reprogram new features into it. * to have it deny
> > > >   certain IP's that she adds or removes dynamically.
> > > >     * Sounds like an interface issue.
> > > >   * to have it deny a range of IP's?
> > > >   * to be written in Eu
> > > >   * to run on linux
> > > >   * to be controllable from a remote windows machine
> > > >   * to be fully tested
> > > >   * to be easy for her to setup
> > > >   * for help with setting it up without others having access
> > > >      Just go by what she says is happening and is going wrong.
> > > 
> > > Debugging and testing is hard. Most of the rest of the items on here
> > > are respectively simple, however.
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > She is NOT be happy with positive results.
> > > > She does NOT have or give a positive outlook about the project
> > > > even when it is going well.
> > > > She constantly DEMANDS better and doesn't praise [message incomplete
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > Which means no one will go into a contract with her, basicly. :)
> > > 
> > > Her attitude is likely more influcenced by her outlook of her life than
> > > the
> > > progress of the project (or so it appears to me anyways). Considering her
> > > life this is completely understandable ... but doesn't make the situation
> > > any easier to deal with. For her or anyone trying to help her.
> > 
> > Well, so far, this project hasn't gone anywhere after over a year of you
> > alledgedly having a working proxy. Yes i am ticked, because i was told it
> > was
> > working several times, and yet you did recode it and tell me it was working,
> > repeatedly.
> 
> You told robsz1 (who in turn told me) that you didn't want it anymore ...
> (minor detail: its only been 4-5 months, not a year, that the proxy has
> stalled)

I gave you the password in Dec, 2002, 7 months ago. It was stalled long 
before that. But since i can't do anything right, i doubt i'd need it to offer
the
world anything i can do, who'd want that?

Kat