Re: Euphoria 2.4 Official Release
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 10:19:08PM -0500, gertie at visionsix.com wrote:
>
>
> On 8 Jul 2003, at 22:41, jbrown105 at speedymail.org wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> > I wrote a sort of one on apache, that works fine. The catch is that it is
> > horribly difficult to debug.
> >
> > I wrote it for her, but then she says she doesn't want it.
>
> I don't see it working. Where is it? Show me. What's the url?
>
I tested it on a local apache thats not exposed to the internet (due to
ISP restrictions). I could show it to you in action tho, you'd just need
a shell account on my local system.
> > And yet she
> > still complains about not having one...even tho one is available. I have
> > said
> > multiple times that it is working. She doesn't even bother to reply when I
> > say
> > that.
>
> I ask you every time where it is. It has not worked for me. You sent me code
> several times, i pointed out the bugs that kept it from working. Then the
> shell
> you guys were using stopped letting me log in, and i gave you the passwords
> to the account. I still do NOT have a WORKING proxy.
I could show you the code and have you point out more bugs ... except that
would go against the "fully tested" clause i suppose, eh?
I'll set it up and give it a full test later tonight (or perhaps early tomorrow
morning) just to see how it fares. If you are still interested in the
program then email me privately and I'll try to arrange a full demonstration
of the program for you (i.e. give you a shell account and everything).
>
> > I'll give the code to anyone else who wants to give it a go, however. (It'll
> > prolly end up public domain.)
> >
> > > * a simple method for her to tell it when she is online or offline.
> > > * a method for her to reprogram new features into it.
> > > * to have it deny certain IP's that she adds or removes dynamically.
> > > * Sounds like an interface issue.
> > > * to have it deny a range of IP's?
> > > * to be written in Eu
> > > * to run on linux
> > > * to be controllable from a remote windows machine
> > > * to be fully tested
> > > * to be easy for her to setup
> > > * for help with setting it up without others having access
> > > Just go by what she says is happening and is going wrong.
> >
> > Debugging and testing is hard. Most of the rest of the items on here
> > are respectively simple, however.
> >
> > >
> > > She is NOT be happy with positive results.
> > > She does NOT have or give a positive outlook about the project
> > > even when it is going well.
> > > She constantly DEMANDS better and doesn't praise [message incomplete
> > >
> > >
> > Which means no one will go into a contract with her, basicly. :)
> >
> > Her attitude is likely more influcenced by her outlook of her life than the
> > progress of the project (or so it appears to me anyways). Considering her
> > life
> > this is completely understandable ... but doesn't make the situation any
> > easier
> > to deal with. For her or anyone trying to help her.
>
> Well, so far, this project hasn't gone anywhere after over a year of you
> alledgedly having a working proxy. Yes i am ticked, because i was told it
> was working several times, and yet you did recode it and tell me it was
> working, repeatedly.
You told robsz1 (who in turn told me) that you didn't want it anymore ...
(minor detail: its only been 4-5 months, not a year, that the proxy has
stalled)
>
> Kat
>
>
>
> TOPICA - Start your own email discussion group. FREE!
>
>
--
/"\ ASCII ribbon | http://www.geocities.com/jbrown1050/
\ / campain against | Linux User:190064
X HTML in e-mail and | Linux Machine:84163
/*\ news, and unneeded MIME | http://verify.stanford.edu/evote.html
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
