Re: 2.4 Official -- memory stuff

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

On 7 Jul 2003, at 15:04, jbrown105 at speedymail.org wrote:

> 
> 
> On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 02:22:10AM -0500, gertie at visionsix.com wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 7 Jul 2003, at 5:30, Andy Serpa wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > > If this is true, why not replace the heap handler DLLs in win9x with
> > > > those
> > > > from 2k ?
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > There are some third-party libraries for this sort of thing (SmartHeap is
> > > one), but Rob would have to pay a license fee to distribute it with
> > > Euphoria..
> > 
> > How does this help win95, since no one can recompile any of the windows 
> > OSs?
> > 
> > Kat
> > 
> 
> Just find a 3rd party heap manager that is written for Win95 I
> guess....failing
> that you could try to find the source for one of those 3rd party libs and port
> it or write your own. But then the intepreter/translator would have to use
> those
> libs explicitly for heap management (instead of the WinNT/XP default dlls).

that rather means the 3rd party heap manager would be a plug-in 
replacement for the oem dll, or RDS is not going to support windows OSs 
below WinNT/XP ?

Kat

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu