OpenEuphoria

Borland vs. Watcom / 2.4 memory

• Posted by Andy Serpa <ac at onehorseshy.com> Jul 01, 2003
• 644 views

For what it's worth regarding the 2.4 "heavy memory recycling" problem 
I've been talking about, the current set of programs that I'm looking at 
that are suffering from this fare MUCH better translated with Borland 
than they do with Watcom. I'm using the current "Open Watcom" version of 
Watcom.

But notice that in the original example I posted, both Watcom & Borland 
come to a dead halt (LCC too), so apparently it isn't immune altogether. 
 I'm actually going to add 256MB of RAM to my system tomorrow.  I wonder 
if that will help...