RE: For Liu Junfeng OOP & Eu, etc.
aku saya wrote:
> By changing a line in the produced C source code,
> you can decrease the delay to below 0.5 second.
>
> But I wonder, is it legal?
>
> K> While looking over the bench marks document from the
> K> latest Euphoria release I noticed something that
> K> reminded me of a question you asked in one of your
> K> posts to the forum... Why not have native OOP features
> K> incorporated into Euphoria.
>
> K> I think the simplest answer must be speed. Euphoria is
> K> 30 - 60 times faster than the popular interpreted
> K> languages which have built in OOP support. I had
> K> referred you to Ruby because it is a popular pure oop
> K> interpreter - Euphoria is almost 60 times faster than
> K> Ruby!.
Ruby and Python all suport OOP, but they are not strong typed
and can't be translated into C or C++.
Another good language is Haskell, it is a functional language,
can both be interpreted or compiled. But it is too difficult to
learn.
> K> Also, recently you expressed interest in how you might
> K> be able to distribute a program you had written to a
> K> friend. You might also download the e2c translator
> K> and distribute the c -translated compiled version of
> K> your program file... the delay time on the free
> K> version is a bit of an annoyance... but its less than
> K> 10 secs, I think.
>
> K> Regards,
> K> Kenneth Rhodes
>
>
Euphoria is one of my favorite languages!
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
