Re: Enhancements to the include system
- Posted by cchris005 at fastmail.fm Dec 15, 2006
- 709 views
Replying to both Pete and Chris > > posted by: Pete Lomax <petelomax at blueyonder.co.uk> > > CChris wrote: > >=20 > > I wrote in some detail about enhancements I plan to make to the current= > > include system. This appears on the relevant EuWiki page in the > > "Requested functionalities" category as solution #2. > If talking about with package=myLib: var1, proc_xyz,... friend, share,= > restrict, redefine, then imo completely the wrong approach, see > my comments (3 * "||" markers) on that page. > > Regards, > Pete > > Complicated? Well the issue of global collision is complicatd, and my perception is that you need several separate techniques to deal with different situations. This involves defining more keywords or constructs, since they are more specialised.=20 Pete: I'll have to study your solution more thoroughly, but what I have seen looked half baked to me, ie creating some confusion of its own and leaving some parts of the problem unresolved. Chris: this could be one of the few issues where concurrent versions may coexist for a while, with the user base either choosing one or pushing for a merger. More efort, but the end result could be a far easier to use language. CChris -- =20=20 cchris005 at fastmail.fm -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Same, same, but different=85