Re: Including Files
- Posted by cklester <cklester at yahoo.com> Dec 02, 2006
- 722 views
Matt Lewis wrote: > cklester wrote: > > Can this please be considered? > > > > I'd like to be able to include files using a variable. For example: > > > > sequence s > > s = dir("plugins") > > for t=1 to length(s) do > > if not find(s,{".",".."}) then > > include s[t] > > end if > > end for > > > > Thanks! :) > > I think the only 'reasonable' way to do this is to use something like > ooeu's eval() (which it can do). I haven't migrated that into the c > backend yet, so you'd be stuck with the euphoria backend. I have some > ideas on how to do it, however, though it's going to be a lot of work. If Euphoria currently knows what to do with this: include myinc.e which is basically include the file 'myinc.e' why can't it simply do something like this: (pseudo-code) sequence s s = "myinc.e" include s which would be the exact same thing as include the file 'myinc.e' as defined in the variable s Instead of 1. parse filename from line of code 2. include filename contents we would have 1. is include parameter a variable? Yes: parse filename from variable No: parse filename from line of code 2. include filename contents It's the EXACT SAME THING, except for that little translation part. But that happens before the include is invoked! Ultimately, the interpreter should be using the exact same unaltered include code it uses now, it's just that there might be a step or two extra before that in determing from whence the filename should be gotten. Do you see what I'm saying? The code used to include files now should not have to change. It can just obtain the filename to include in a new way. I hope that makes sense. It sure does in my head. 8) Is this a single-pass/double-pass issue? -=ck "Programming in a state of Euphoria." http://www.cklester.com/euphoria/