OpenEuphoria

Re: Ubuntu Edgy vs wxWidgets

• Posted by ChrisBurch2 <crylex at freeuk.co.uk> Mar 22, 2007
• 567 views

Matt Lewis wrote:
> 
> ChrisBurch2 wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > Adding -m32 to the CXX flags forces 32 bit compilation, and reduces the
> > error
> > count. It shouldn't make a difference whether this is present or not on
> > 32 bit machines, so try it, if it doesn't then perhaps add it (or make an 
> > option for 64 bit machine detection)
> > 
> > However, it still produces a couple of errors (and I can't copy and paste on
> > this machine), namely
> > 
> > /usr/local/include/wx-2.8/wx/string.h
> > line 827 : wxChar& wxstring::operator[](unsigned int) cannot be overloaded
> > line 824 : wxChar& wxstring::operator[](size_t)
> > 
> > this is c++ stuff, which is hopelessly over my head. Sorry.
> > 
> 
> That's weird.  It's all wxWidgets stuff, which, by the way, will need
> to be compiled as 32 bit, as well, which may be the problem.
> 
> I found this link, 
> <a
> href="http://www.wxwidgets.org/wiki/index.php/Compiling_WxWidgets#Linux_building_for_i386_on_an_x86_64_machine">http://www.wxwidgets.org/wiki/index.php/Compiling_WxWidgets#Linux_building_for_i386_on_an_x86_64_machine</a>
> 
> It's semi-helpful.  He mentions issues about not having 32-bit gtk.
> 
> Matt

Ok, yes it was compiled as 64 bit - will recompile with the 32 bit flags, and
get back to
you - it may be a day or two now.

Chris