Re: Ping Rob, scanner.e query

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message 

Robert Craig wrote:
> without noticing that "absolute = FALSE" was now superfluous.
Sorry to nit-pick, but just to be clear, as well as the absolute = FALSE
statement did you also delete the definition of integer absolute as well?
It was the short-circuit-able 'or' I saw as the bigger flaw/that hit me.

> > seems to be fairly consistently about 6% slower bound than interperted.
> > No biggie, just asking if you (or anyone else) get the same results.
<snip>
> One time out of 3 I saw 2% difference, where the bound version was faster. 
OK, that alone answers it completely, no worries.

Regards,
Pete

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu