OpenEuphoria

Re: imp, discussions, infix, map, true, apply, eval

• Posted by "Carl R. White" <C.R.White at SCM.BRAD.AC.UK> Oct 29, 1998
• 537 views

> Comments?

1) I never thought someone would out-length me postwise :)

2) map()? Have you been studying Haskell?
   [Haskell is God awful functional language. It's unnecessarily
    over-recursive. Better than Prolog though <g> ]

3) I personally prefer "function infix name()...end function". It's
   more readable (IMHO) and easier to code ;)

4) From another post: Someone mentioned using <= for implication. I don't
   really like this as it implies (no pun intended) _reverse_ implication
   (which incidentally, I accidentally coded in my earlier post. It should
   have read "not a or b" rather than "a or not b". Oops.)

Carl

--
Carl R White -- Final Year Computer Science at the University of Bradford
E-mail...: cyrek- at -bigfoot.com -- Remove the hyphens before mailing. Ta :)
URL......: http://www.bigfoot.com/~cyrek/
Ykk rnyllaqur rgiokc cea nyemdok ymc giququezka caysgr -- B.Q.Vgesa