Re: object replication
Michael,
It is perfectly good Euphoria, and better readable, to write:
result =3D repeat(repeat(0, 12), 1500))
>I think the reason for the first routine performing so badly was
inefficient
>programming technique. I had been appending the entire resultant sequenc=
e
>together, say, 1500 * 12 appendations(including piecing of name strings
>together) . But my second routine declared space first (in a manner of
>speaking), ie:
>sequence result
>result=3Drepeat({0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0},1500)
>and then various direct assignments were made to it.
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
