EuOS - Some thoughts
- Posted by Peter Blue <PeterBlue at COMPUSERVE.COM> Oct 18, 1998
- 606 views
Hi Euphorians, There has been a bit of interest in this EuOS thing so I will waffle on some more. Some friends and I were talking about a maths problem. One lady said "Youv'e got a computer, why don't you just type in the question - should = be no problem for a machine that powerful". I told her computers didn't work= like that and she said "Why not ??" - It was that last remark ( and far t= oo many episodes of Star Trek:TNG/DS9/Voyager ) that got me thinking. 1. Dispite all the advances in CPU speed (x 1000+ in the last 10 years), computers aren't really any faster because the software is so inefficient= and convoluted. 2. Dispite the advances in storage capacity, we seem to be only slightly better off because software is now so bloated. = 3. Despite all the advances in software development tools, software is ju= st as buggy as it ever was. 4. Despite WinDoze and other GUIs, computers are still clumsy to use. So what went wrong ? I would suggest that the "Features War" is partly to= blame along with a lack of imagination. We have word processors, DTP, paint packages, drawing packages, browsers,= etc but they all achieve the same thing - they all process text / binary image files of one kind or another. We have searchable databases, multi-media encyclopedias and web-pages - aren't they much the same thing= ? I am not suggesting that we write a new DOS, I am suggesting something a bit more radical, a new form of interface where you could create a document, check its spelling, draw diagrams on it, insert spread-sheet cells in it, mail it to whoever and be able to search for it along with a= ny other kind of data - an interface where you could phrase simple questions= or formulas and get the spelling checked at the same time. Such a highly integrated interface would have a mix of GUI and CLI elements in it. No doubt, some of you will tell me all this can be done now, but just loo= k what it takes to do all this - Hundreds of EXEs, DLLs, OCXs, drivers, ActiveX components to name but a few. I'm sure there is a simpler way. I have already come up with some ideas but I would be interested to see what you guys (& girls) can come up with ! Peter Blue