OpenEuphoria

Re: QuirkBasic...again

• Posted by Kevin Sieger <simkin at ZEBRA.NET> Oct 09, 1998
• 664 views

Matt Z Nunyabidness wrote:

> >Which is more readable
> >
> >for...next
> >or for...end for
>
> uh, for next. But i'm not talking about for...next or for...end for. Hey,
> does Eu let you use :'s?
>
> Man, Eu still lives in the days when BASICers still lived in the
> WHILE/WEND era!
> ________________

Love this!!  Look below...he states that Euphoria is a cut above, yet he now
wants toi basically (no pun on BASIC) state that Basic is better than Eu...

Matt, if you think that Basic is so good, perhaps you are on the wrong list.
There is no sense in arguing which is better - we are all here because we
like Eu, not Basic.

> _
> When it comes to programming languages, Euphoria is a cut above
> matt1278 at juno.com Euphoria programmer
> Webbers: <A HREF="mailto:prezsoft at juno.com">prezsoft at juno.com</A>,
> president of SoftCo. All virus proggers should die horrible deaths™
> O ya, i program in BASIC too
>
> ___________________________________________________________________
> You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
> Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
> or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]